Welcome to the home of Northumbria University’s Social and Cultural Geographies Research Group.

Research in this area embraces a range of interests across human geography at Northumbria University, whilst incorporating links with cognate social science subjects and encompassing relationships with organisations outside of academia.

Staff associated with this group are primarily interested in the co-production of space, identities, difference and inequalities through a range of geographical contexts across the UK, Europe and beyond. The group is concerned with both the development and application of critical geographical theory in this area, but also committed to spatial justice and the public utility of research through grounded methodologies, practical application and multiple forms of dissemination.

Funding has been secured from a range of sources including the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), the European Union, the British Academy, the Leverhulme Trust, the Marsden Fund of the Royal Society of New Zealand, third sector organisations and local government.

Current areas of research includes: creative industries; geographies of crime; geopolitics; labour geographies; media convergence; migration and everyday b/ordering; platform capitalism; sex work; visual methodologies; consumption and waste

Membership of the group stretches across all four Faculties of the University.

2019-2020 Research Seminar series

Sept 27, 13:00-14:00, location Sandyford 417, Daniel Schiller, Chair of Economic and Social Geography, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Greifswald, Germany

Title: Knowledge-based Bioeconomy: Research Perspectives for Economic Geography?

October 30, Wednesday, 13:00-14:00, ELA 009, Mara Ferreri, Northumbria University, Geography and Environmental Sciences

Title: The long legacy of short-life housing co-ops

abstract: The wave of organised mass squatting that started in London in the late 1960s had a profound impact on the city’s built environment, housing practices and imaginaries. Groups excluded from existing housing provision or seeking unconventional forms of collective dwelling occupied publicly-owned empty properties and set up networked, politicised and precarious housing commons. Social infrastructures of mutual support, local alliances and knowledge-sharing made this housing commoning possible; with time, some were formalised into ‘short-life housing co-operatives’, providing affordable community-led housing for thousands of individuals. During the 1990s, the temporary legal and social assemblages that sustained them succumbed to market pressures and changes in local policies. While most disappeared, however, others transformed into long-term social rented and self-managed cooperative housing. Drawing on archival research and in-depth interviews, in this presentation I revisit the little-known case of squats that became short-life co-ops in London to examine the specific political and institutional conditions that made them possible, their development over time, and their material and symbolic legacy as a housing commons.

November 8, Friday, 13:00-14:00 Miriam Gay-Antaki, University of Edinburgh, School of Geosciences, ELA 108

Title: “Feminist Geographies of Climate Change: From Climate Negotiations to Women in Mexico”

Abstract: What can feminist geographies tell us about the connections between the vulnerability of some women to climate change impacts and the exclusions of people and viewpoints that occur in climate science, policy and action?

I use feminist geography to ground environmental governance around gender and climate change by calling attention to the micropolitical and everyday practices encountered in the IPCC, the COPs and the households and communities in rural Mexico that are the recipients of gendered climate projects. I problematize tendencies in climate and development work that homogenize gender and promote simplistic solutions that fail to achieve gender equality or reduce the negative impacts of climate change. 

I propose that feminist geographies of climate change can challenge the global conversation of gender and climate change and better inform climate related problems and solutions.


December 11, Wednesday, 14:00-15:00, Katie Oven, Northumbria University, Geography and Environmental Sciences, ELA 009 

Title: “Governing landslide risk in post-earthquake Nepal: Reflections on policy, politics and the meaning of place”Landslides are a pervasive hazard in rural Nepal where the impacts are manifest in very tangible ways: as a chronic threat to both lives and livelihoods; and via damage to or destruction of houses, farmland, roads and trails. While rural residents are very much aware of the causes and triggering mechanisms of landslides, and have developed their own ways of reducing the risks they face, gaps in local knowledge exist. This is particularly the case when the hazard context itself evolves, for example, following a high magnitude earthquake which brings new behaviours to otherwise familiar landscapes. The 2015 Gorkha earthquake, which triggered over 22,000 landslides, the equivalent of decades of ‘normal’ landsliding, is a case in point. Some land has gone, some is uninhabitable and in some places the risks are unknown and perhaps unknowable. Householders are rebuilding and are seeking definitive answers to their questions and concerns, but science remains some distance from being able to provide an answer, and government lacks technical capacity to respond. This uncertainty is compounded further by local politics and attachment to place which cannot be ignored. Drawing on research undertaken as part of a DFID/NERC Science for Humanitarian Emergencies and Resilience (SHEAR) project, I will reflect on the challenge of landslide risk management in the context of post-disaster reconstruction from the perspective of three interlinked themes: policy, politics and the meaning of place. In doing so, I seek to highlight the value of bringing seemingly incompatible datasets, generated from different epistemological positions, into dialogue for more effective risk management.